Ethereum Taken Over by a 'Cartel' (?)
TL;DR
If you want to get paid to process transactions on the Ethereum network, you need to deposit (stake) 32 ETH (~$60k) and have a bunch of specific hardware/tech know-how.
LSDs let folks skip all that by setting up the hardware and getting everything working - then let others contribute any amount of ETH to their staking pools, earning ~4% p/y.
Here's where the 'cartel' part comes into the story: there's one company (Lido) that makes up 74% of the liquid staking market!
This centralization opens Ethereum up to regulatory scrutiny.
The solution? Make solo staking easier. Lower the 32 ETH barrier, and make the set up process idiot proof.
Full Story
You know that episode of Community, where Abed gets a job at the cafeteria so he and his friends can get first dibs on chicken fingers?
Yeah, well, there's a worry that something similar is happening with Ethereum.
Specifically with liquid staking derivatives (LSDs) - and before you scroll away - it's not as complex as the name suggests!
Basically, if you want to get paid to process transactions on the Ethereum network, you need to deposit (stake) a minimum of 32 ETH (~$60k) and have a bunch of specific hardware / tech know-how to get started.
Then, you can start processing transactions / earning - and the more ETH you stake, the more you earn per year.
LSDs let folks skip all that noise.
They set up all the hardware and get everything working - then let others contribute any amount of ETH to their staking pools, where they earn ~4% return per year.
Here's where the 'cartel' part comes into the story:
There's one company (Lido) that makes up 74% of the liquid staking market!
That's a dominant position that would be celebrated in most circles of business, but in crypto it's a big worry.
Because if Lido were to be hit with lawsuits from government bodies, saying they need to stop processing certain transactions for certain people - then crypto starts to look a lot like the banking system.
But here's the real problem:
You know who else doesn't like centralization in the cryptocurrency space? The US government.
Cryptocurrencies that can't prove themselves to be sufficiently decentralized have a high likelihood of being regulated into oblivion. Not good.
The solution?
People much smarter us are suggesting this:
Make solo staking easier. Lower the 32 ETH barrier, and make the set up process idiot proof.
Sounds good to us.